Loading...
Loading...
Quick answer: Use Playwright if you have developers who can write and maintain test scripts. Use Rihario if you want AI to handle everything without code.
Here's how testing the same login flow looks in each tool:
test('user can login', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('/login');
// Find email input
await page.fill('#email', 'test@example.com');
// Find password input
await page.fill('#password', 'password123');
// Click login button
await page.click('#submit-btn');
// Assert redirect
await expect(page).toHaveURL('/dashboard');
});⚠️ If any selector changes, the test breaks and requires manual fixing.
"Test the login flow: enter email test@example.com and password password123, then verify the user lands on the dashboard."
✅ AI finds elements by purpose. If selectors change, tests self-heal automatically.
For most indie hackers and solo developers, yes. Rihario covers functional, visual, performance, security, and accessibility testing without code. However, if you need extremely custom test logic or are already invested in Playwright, it may complement rather than replace. See the detailed comparison.
The library is free, but you pay in developer time. Writing and maintaining tests takes significant effort. You also need infrastructure to run tests (CI minutes, servers). Rihario's pricing includes all infrastructure.
Yes. Since Rihario uses plain English test descriptions, you can start fresh without migrating code. Most users run both in parallel during transition, then phase out Playwright as Rihario covers more.
Rihario: 3 minutes to first test. Playwright: 30+ minutes for setup, then hours writing your first complete test suite.
See how Rihario compares in your own project. Free trial, no credit card required.